home > events > The Inaugural World Congress on Refractive Error and Service Development


Congress Evaluation

1. ABOUT YOURSELF (tick all that apply)
1.1 Did you attend as a
1.2 Which region are you from? (as per IAPB regions)
1.3 How was your attendance funded?
1.4 How did you find out about the congress?

2. PRE-CONGRESS
How would you rate the following aspects of the organization in terms of:
Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
Very
Poor
2.1 Announcement of the congress
2.2 Website information
2.3 Information provided beforehand
2.4 Congress registration process
2.5 Congress fee
2.6 Assistance received/communication precongress
2.7 Other comments on pre-congress organisation:

3. AT THE CONGRESS
How would you rate the following aspects of the organization in terms of:
Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
Very Poor
3.1 Accessibility of the venue
3.2 Appropriateness of venue (size, location etc.)
3.3 Clarity and lay out of the programme guide
3.4 The technical/audio/visual aspects of the congress
3.5 The range and quality of the food
3.6 The length of congress sessions
3.7 The organization of the congress in general
3.8 Other comments on pre-congress organisation:

4. CONGRESS CONTENT
On average, how would you rate the presentations and discussions in terms of:
Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
Very Poor
4.1 Relevance of the topics presented
4.2 Coverage of issues in Refractive Error
4.3 Increasing your knowledge
4.4 Quality of speakers
4.5 Quality of exhibitions
4.6 Other comments on congress content:

4.7 Did you attend any Continuous Professional Development sessions (CPD)? Yes No
On average, how would you rate the presentations and discussions in terms of:
Excellent
Good
Average
Poor
Very Poor
4.8 Relevance of the topics presented
4.9 Effectiveness of presenters
4.10 Length of sessions
4.11 Increasing your professional knowledge
4.12 Other comments on the CPD sessions of the Congress:


5. ABOUT THE NEXT CONGRESS
5.1 The congress was successful in raising awareness of Refractive Error?
5.2 Would you attend the next congress?
5.3 What duration would be most suitable for?      
  Congress  
  Sessions  
  CPD Workshops  
5.4 How frequently should the Congress be held?
5.5 Where do you think the next Congress should be held?
5.6 In future exhibitions, what would you like to see more of? (Tick more than one)
     
New technology Training materials and products Optical Equipment
     
Spectacle Frames Contact Lenses NGO and other organizational exhibits
     
Other: Please specify
5.7 Place a tick in the following areas in of your interest? (Tick more than one)
   
RE in a developing countries context Training
   
Monitoring and Evaluation Research
   
Service delivery Continuing Professional Education
   
Public health Clinical sessions
   
Low Vision Funding
   
Other (Please specify)

6. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
In your view, how could this congress be improved for next time?

Send to:
Case sensitive:
I0H6H813H2HXN4I2
*Verification:

*required
Typing the red characters only below helps ensure that a person, not an automated program, is sending this message.
 
Grandparent with a “GRAND VISION”
 
 
 
rss RSS |Copyrights 2007 - ICEE - Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Site Map | Online Donation | Intranet